Everyone,
As usual, my struggle with Kaiser continues and my latest grievance will follow this introductory paragraph. So far, as a result of this grievance below was a call from my GI asking me to talk with her a week ago Monday. I called back the same day, telling her assistant that I will be home for the rest of the week and am available. Well, no return call on that. All is currently stagnant. I will, more than likely, be off of TPN as of Thursday morning. As am now down from 2000 cc fluid with TPN to 1000 this week, I am having to rely on my own intake to stay well. I am already, for the past 3 days, having pancreatic pain up to “7” on the pain scale for many hours at a time. I began my “7” last night (Sunday) and it has continued into tonight with no letting go. May have to use my liquid morphine. Here is my letter and, please, tell me what you think about it, OK?
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Member Services
Re: TPN and Proper, Professional Medical Care
On August 22, 2007, I had placed at my right upper chest a Hickman central line for use with TPN, blood draws, radiological testing, and any further need for IV infusion during any future hospital stays as I no longer had the ability to provide venous access for these procedures and testing. At that point, all they could find, after four or five IV sticks, was a vein for a pediatric venal insertion for an IV. Prior to this stay, I had 3 hospital stays since April of 5, 11, and 11 days as well as 2-3 ER visits for pancreatic pain and the need to be NPO so that I could get the bowel rest (more particularly for me was that I would get gut rest so that my pancreas could rest and get better). After the placement of the Hickman (I was told that I would have a dual chamber portacath before entering the angioplasty theater by Doctor Brown, wherein he lied to me and put in something that I did not approve nor was asked to approve during the procedure), I was then faced by Dr… Wong, who took over my case from Dr. Apostolakos, and his overall disapproval of this procedure as well as my going on TPN. I left the hospital on August 25 on TPN. There was no plan, no guidelines, nothing to determine the stoppage of TPN or for the removal of the Hickman port.
Since that day of the Hickman placement, there has not been ONE doctor’s appointment for health examinations to determine the level of my overall health. (I did see Dr. Choy on October 4, 2007, for a “meet and greet session†wherein I was supposed to be able to address my concerns about my health care and treatment as well as any issues that I may have, in which none of this really occurred on a substantive level). NO guidelines were set as to what would be the criteria for the stoppage of TPN. Furthermore, there were no examinations made to determine improvement or deterioration during the entire time that I have been on TPN. However, although I knew the risks for being on TPN with a central line from the beginning, all of a sudden there was a decision made to take me off of TPN. This decision was not made on the basis of my overall physical health (there were no physicals, only blood tests every week). Instead, it was based on the overall fear of three doctors that I may become infected while being on TPN, a criterion that could have been used from the very first day of being on TPN, or the 5th day, or the 20th day, or whatever. I argue that this is an invalid way to make this particular determination as it is not at all objective and does not have anything to deal with my CURRENT health or condition. However, there were, again, NO guidelines to determine what would indicate that I should be off of TPN at all! Were this done in a professional and competent manner, I would have had at least a visit with the doctor each month (or even every two weeks) to ascertain my overall health each time and markers placed as to my overall health and whether or not we were reaching those goals. Hence, I feel that my overall care was reprehensible, leading to an uninformed opinion about the stopping of TPN with no PHYSICAL data used to make that determination (other than blood tests). If TPN is necessary for my overall health, then the risk of infection is outweighed by the benefits.
To relieve this situation, I am asking that I be seen once each month for the next two months while on maintenance TPN (12 hours per day) until they can actually ascertain my physical condition as warranting the stoppage of TPN. I would want this to begin on December 1, 2007, ending on January 31, 2008. I also want time to discuss any problems that I am having with eating or drinking fluids during this time so as to ascertain whether or not I would be successful in maintaining my health while off of TPN. Right now, I feel that I will not be successful as, before going on TPN, I was not able to take in the proper amount of fluids so that I would not become dehydrated. I, also, was not able to eat a proper amount of food as well as types of foods to keep me from becoming malnourished. I repeat, I do not feel or see myself as being successful in keeping proper fluid or nutrition levels that I will not become dehydrated or malnourished. I have expressed this to BOTH Drs. Choy and Pauley by phone and they have ignored or not addressed this issue at all.
Currently, even with TPN, I am unable to drink a proper amount of fluid. Also, I am able to eat only a very small amount of food. While my overall health has improved due to the nutrition that I am now getting with TPN, I do not feel that I will be at all successful while off of TPN and that I will require a least a maintenance level to stay out of the hospital. Right now, since I have been on TPN, I have set a three-month record of not having to go to the ER or to be admitted to the hospital for pain and dehydration. Right now, I feel that, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!†If cost is a consideration, surely the cost of TPN is less than the cost of repeated hospitalizations.
Next, I was told that I could keep the Hickman line in until it is deemed no longer necessary. I asked Dr. Choy what those guidelines would be and she said that she would tell me on the phone at a later date. As I have been lied to too often by other Kaiser physicians, I made a written request via email for WRITTEN guidelines as to what would determine the removal of the Hickman line and the upper and lower limits of the time that it can be kept in should my health deteriorate after I get off of TPN. I asked for this on November 19, 2007. This request was written as follows:
I need to have a set of written guidelines that state under what conditions the Hickman central line will be removed. I know that I cannot eat well due to so many foods causing too many problems for me (nausea, pancreatic pain, etc. AND [the] resultant pain enough to lead me to seek hospitalization and gut rest NPO). I will need at least 4 months after cessation of TPN before I can feel assured that I will not repeat the cycle of pain and hospitalization that I have gone through this year alone. Also, I am adamant in my feeling that I should be on TPN for at least another 3 months in order to gain strength and stamina before having to go through this cycle again. At this point, while I finally have a bit of a respite, I also feel that this move to take me off of TPN is not only premature but also cruel.
Anyse
As of today, November 26, 2007, I have not received any answer or communication regarding this (of course, I am told that all email will be responded to in two days. In the past, I sent Dr. Choy two emails in the first week of October and, still, both have remained unanswered). Therefore, I doubt that I would get an answer at all on this request.
I have further complaints regarding my overall care while on TPN. While I was in the hospital in July and in August, MRI’s were requested as they wanted to get films on the status of my pancreas and other areas of my abdomen. During the July admission, they were unable to do an MRI because the only venal access that I had was a PICC line and they could not direct the 600 cc’s of contrast through a PICC line and I had no other vein that could be used and they could not put in a regular IV access due to no veins accessible at that time. During my August admission, another MRI was requested. The only IV access that I had then was a pediatric IV (that was all that they could get after 5 painful sticks) that was on its last legs on its 6th day of existence. Again, there was no venal access that they could use to push those 600 cc’s of contrast through. Since then, as it seems that an MRI was so important during both admissions, no one has requested an MRI while I have had proper venal access that can be used by the MRI technicians.
Finally, due to so many problems in the past with my care, I am requesting a highly qualified and trained medical doctor who will be responsible for overseeing all of my medical care and treatment. I need a “point†person who will be able to answer questions directly and honestly without attempting some form of subterfuge so that he/she will not have to answer questions that I have regarding my care and treatment at any time that it becomes necessary.
To summarize all of this, there has been far less than professional follow-up in terms of proper physicals (while only taking blood tests every week), proper diagnostics (no MRI), no guidelines as to the goals and to the time that TPN would be stopped, no guidelines as to what would be the criteria for the removal of the Hickman port, and no guidelines as to what will determine whether or not I will go back onto TPN if I am unable to keep up liquid and nutritional intake, as well as no doctor who can take charge of my overall care and treatment and answer questions that I may have regarding my own care and treatment honestly and forthrightly. To resolve these issues, I am requesting the following:
- Two more months on TPN with proper physicals with allowance for discussion about nutritional and fluid intake during treatment;
- Objective guidelines as to what will determine the stoppage of TPN that are not based upon a fear of something that was a part of the risk of placing a Hickman port as well as putting me on TPN in the first place;
- Objective guidelines as to what conditions will have to be met to determine the removal of the Hickman port;
- That proper radiological testing occur during the last months during TPN infusion; and
- That I have a highly trained medical doctor to keep oversight of my care in the future who is not biased and will follow or establish reasonable guidelines for my overall treatment and care as well as to be able to answer my questions regarding my overall treatment and care directly and honestly without having to resort to some form of subterfuge so as to avoid doing so.
Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter.
Karen Joslin
Thank you all so much!
Much love to all of you from the depth of my heart,
Anyse